This is a paperbound reprint of a 1997 work. The author is editor of the International Third World Studies Journal and Review, has published essays on critical reasoning, and is affiliated with the U. of Nebraska, Omaha. Here he investigates both theoretical and practical aspects of how rationality can be used to settle the idological disputes that lead to armed conflict. Challenging the assertion of Noam Chomsky and Antony Flew that a rational basis for the resolution of ideological disputes can be found in appeals to ideologically neutral facts, he maintains that supposedly neutral facts and observations are actually laden with ideology, and that in spite of this, mutually beneficial resolution of disputes is possible. Annotation c. Book News, Inc., Portland, OR (booknews.com)